Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Wiskandt vs Ammar Elamin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wiskandt vs Elamin analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Wiskandt vs Ammar Elamin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wiskandt 0 - 0 Elamin
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wiskandt has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Elamin has won 46.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wiskandt, in recent form, has won 55.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Elamin has won 51.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.48% and 34.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wiskandt has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elamin has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wiskandt has won 62.65% of matches played (W/L 52/ 31), with Elamin winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wiskandt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 71/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28). Elamin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 54/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Wiskandt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 52/ 30), where as Elamin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wiskandt has played against opponents with an average rank of 162.3 while Elamin has played against players with an average rank of 56.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wiskandt has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elamin has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wiskandt has converted 42.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elamin has converted 37.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
602
Rank
602
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
56% (103-82)
Career Total W/L
50% (60-61)
62% (21-13)
YTD W/L
67% (14-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Wiskandt | Ammar Elamin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (21/13) | 67% (14/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (49/29) | 61% (30/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (397/300) | 55% (264/214) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (21/12) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 83 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.06 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.97 | 46.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1539/2260) | 66% (260/396) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1010/1539) | 62% (162/260) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (357/721) | 44% (60/136) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (128/304) | 34% (14/41) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1048/2319) | 40% (153/384) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (21/12) | 67% (14/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (21/33) | 67% (14/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (24/20) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (24/4) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 29% (7/2) |
Max Wiskandt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Samir Hamza Reguig
Player
Max Wiskandt
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Loann Massard
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve %
71%
(
22 of
31)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
7 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
43
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Leonardo Rossi
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Enzo Wallart
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ammar Elamin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Ammar Elamin
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ammar Elamin
Player
Kyle Rae
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Menelaos Efstathiou
Player
Ammar Elamin
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ammar Elamin
Player
Christian Capacci
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Wiskandt Vs Elamin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
